Carbon Emissions Per Passenger Decrease More Than 50% Since 1990 →, Why Doesn't The Boeing 777 Have Four Engines Like The A340? Both aircraft have marked significant milestones in aviation history; A380 being the largest operational carrier and Boeing 787 claims to be the world’s most fuel efficient airliner. ( Log Out /  Fly-by-wire spoilers and outboard ailerons, spearheaded by the 787 Dreamliner, are thought to save weight. In designing Boeing 787 Dreamliner modern new engineering  were introduced, pioneering  a new class of airliners and making it one of the most efficient airliners ever built. Compare the Difference Between Similar Terms. Did physical size matter? It is 20% more fuel efficient than aircraft of the same class (ex. However, in terms of the comparison to the larger 787-10, the A380 appears, on paper, to be the more flexible aircraft on account of its longer range. The extra efficiency for the 787-8 comes not only from the new engines, but by also being able to fly faster. If you spend less time in the air, the 7% fuel efficiency is increased further. A380 Vs A350 Vs B787 All three planes offer a very similar experience from a passenger’s perspective, which far exceeds the one offered onboard older, more conventional aircraft types. Difference Between Airbus A380 and Boeing 747, Difference Between Helicopter and Chopper, Difference Between Coronavirus and Cold Symptoms, Difference Between Coronavirus and Influenza, Difference Between Coronavirus and Covid 19, Difference Between Kernel and Operating System, Difference Between Circuit Switching and Packet Switching, Difference Between Gravimetric and Titrimetric Analysis, Difference Between Orthoboric Acid and Metaboric Acid, Difference Between Regeneration and Fibrosis, Difference Between Culture and Media in Microbiology, Difference Between Oxirane Glycidyl and Epoxy Groups, Difference Between Filgrastim and Lenograstim. Anti turbulence system. All three planes offer a very similar experience from a passenger’s perspective, which far exceeds the one offered onboard older, more conventional aircraft types. Filed Under: Plane Tagged With: 787, 787 Dreamliner, A380, Airbus A380, Boeing 787, Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Boeing Dreamliner. As we see, an Airbus A380 burns twice as much fuel per hour as a Boeing 787-9. The Airbus A330neo is Airbus’s response to the popular Boeing 787 Dreamliner. 747 is more fuel efficient, whilst the 747 has nothing on the 787 or A350 in terms of fuel efficiency, the 747 is more fuel efficient than the A380. However I will be comparing Hub and Spoke vs Point to Point that these two aircraft from Airbus and Boeing are built for. I would say the 787 is much more efficient than the airbus offerings, and with sky high fuel prices that could give Boeing the competitive edge. The new, and larger, Airbus A380 wing design ensured future versions of the aircraft could handle a total weight of up to 750 tons. • A380-800 is a double deck, single aisle aircraft while Boeing 787 is a single aisle, twin aisle aircraft. The Airbus A380 also has a new wing design (at launch), which uses aluminum alloys for wings and fuselage, and composite materials for the middle wing box, which reduces the overall weight of the aircraft. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. The A350-900 and A350-1000 has similar CASM, max range and efficiency envelopes. A head-to … Looking at the likely number of passengers, the range and the fuel capacity, the fuel consumption figures for the A380, Boeing 787, 777, and 747 very comparable. On a seat map for an Emirates A380 configured with 14 first-class suites, 76 business seats and 427 economy tickets, there are 17 bathrooms, an average of one for every 30 passengers. Fuel efficiency is the most important, if not the latest, buzzword in aviation. • The A380 can take off with more weight than the B-787, while B787 has higher fuel efficiency. This was the crux of the Airbus vs Boeing debate. On board bar (Emirates, Etihad, Qatar). Want to learn how to identify these aircraft in less than 5 seconds? - Elite News. Airbus states a fuel rate consumption of their A380 at less than 3 L/100 km per passenger (78 passenger-miles per US gallon). Did physical size matter? In 2018, some of Norweigan’s Boeing 787 Dreamliners were grounded due to engine issues. Cover credits: Instagram user: contrailsphotography, AIKA Explains: How the Concorde Changes the World, Why the Airbus A321XLR is a turning point in aviation history. The A380, despite all the passenger space, is harder to make profitable than the 787 series and one of the major reasons why the aircraft is slowly being retired. When Airbus and Boeing go at each other, we’re skeptical of the the information provide for the obvious reasons. The A350 is just ramping up production this year, while the 787 has been in production about 5 years now. In fact, many of the most efficient planes of today are the smallest ones. Cabin pressure not quite as good, compared to 787, 350. The Airbus A380 entered commercial service just 11 years ago and can only be accommodated at about a dozen airports worldwide due to its size. This video is about the Airbus A380 vs Boeing 787. • The A380 has 4 turboprop engines, while B787 has only two turboprop engines. This seems counter-intuitive. Or an A380? ( Log Out /  Both aircraft have a place in the world. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Because of its fuel efficiency, the 787 can fly further than its predecessors and has opened more than 50 new non-stop routes around the world. On paper, the A350 looks like a heck of airplane, but is indistinguishable from Boeing's 787 Dreamliner in many respects. What do you think? The Airbus A380 also has a new wing design (at launch), which uses aluminum alloys for wings and fuselage, and composite materials for the middle wing box, which reduces the overall weight of the aircraft. Find out which three major airlines are the biggest gas guzzlers. The A350 and B787 Dreamliner are the world’s most advanced airplanes, produced respectively by Airbus (Europe) and Boeing (USA). A380 Vs A350 Vs B787. The 787 family reduces fuel use and CO2 emissions by 20-30% and has a 60% smaller noise footprint than the models they replace. 3 Examination on Fuel vs Range Diagrams ... Q Fuel Mass Flow η p Efficiency Propeller . • Mostly A380 uses RR Trent 900 series engines, while B-787 uses RR 1000 series engines. Lufthansa, which has ordered both the A380 and 747-8, concludes the A380 burns less fuel per 100 passenger kilometers, though the figure is 3% lower on a litre-per-passenger kilometer basis. Posts: 2122; Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:54 am; USER_STATUS: Online; Re: Fuel consumption A350 vs 787 #20707291. The Airbus A380 is the largest passenger carrier which has a seating capacity of 555 in a standard configuration. The below table provides the numbers for you! 1, 500 aluminum sheets and 40,000 – 50,000 fasteners give 80% reduction in fasteners), resulting in 30% reduction, in maintenance costs. But the 787 has been built with fuel efficiency in mind and it shows when comparing final numbers. Airbus A380 vs. Boeing 787. So whilst the A380 might have way more fuel onboard (it can carry 85,472 gallons compared to 52,300 gallons on the 777X), the A380 needs it because the plane is nowhere near as efficient as the 777X, costing the operator far more money in the long run. Change ). The A380 is designed for long-range hub to hub flights, whilst the 787 series is perfect for more bespoke direct routes away from hubs. Boeing's 737 Max wooed airlines with its cost-saving fuel economy. Enter your email address to follow us and receive notifications of new posts by email. Airbus claims its fuel efficiency, control system and sound-reduction technology also make it the most advanced airliner ever built. The European plane maker says the A380 burns 2 percent less fuel per seat than the 747-8. 737 vs A319, 320, 321 or 787 vs A330 Neo, 747 Intercontinental vs A380 or 777 and 777X vs A350. For the GEnx, GE advertises on their website: Up to 15% improved fuel efficiency compared to GE’s CF6 engine. And this isn’t just by a slim margin, this is by a lot (at least in aviation terms anyway!) The new, and larger, Airbus A380 wing design ensured future versions of the aircraft could handle a total weight of up to 750 tons. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Copyright © 2010-2018 Difference Between. The Dreamliner has lighter components, using carbon fibre rather than aluminium. BY AirKevin - Wed Sep 12, … Crucially, however, it also built the Dreamliner with modern, environmental factors such as fuel efficiency in mind. the A380 is a competitor to the 747, the 787 replaces the 767. The purchase of an A380 or 787 is far less a decision between manufacturers than a question of competing visions of the economics and future of air travel. The longest and newest 787 Dreamliner, the 787-10, will fly 330 passengers up to 6,430 nautical miles (11,910 km) -- or more than 90 percent of twin-aisle routes -- with unprecedented efficiency: 25 percent better fuel and emissions than the airplanes it will replace and 10 percent better than the best on offer by … These aircrafts are attempts by both companies in their race for dominance in the airliner production. Boeing 747-400). Fuel Airbus A350) due to advanced engine technologies introduced in 787, and it produces 20% less emissions. I would say the 787 is much more efficient than the airbus offerings, and with sky high fuel prices that could give Boeing the competitive edge. This graph keeps on giving. The European plane maker says the A380 burns 2 percent less fuel per seat than the 747-8. looking at official statistics from both Boeing’s and Airbus’s websites The Boeing 787-9 in particular was the most fuel-efficient aircraft on 2016 transpacific flights at 39 passenger kilometers per liter of fuel, or 60% better than the A380. ... To compete directly with the A380, Boeing’s 747-8 uses fuel-efficient engines like the 787 to carry 450 passengers. The latter was the first of the two companies to introduce the concept of a revolutionary new and fuel-efficient plane. • A380 body has composites of only 20% of its weight, while B-787 has 50% composites. This was the crux of the Airbus vs Boeing debate. 777X would be near the 787 on this graph as it uses much of the same technology. How can airlines tackle it? But Boeing responded with their Boeing -787 Dreamliner, which is smaller than the A380 but highly efficient and profitable for airliners. So whilst the A380 might have way more fuel onboard (it can carry 85,472 gallons compared to 52,300 gallons on the 777X), the A380 needs it because the plane is nowhere near as efficient as the 777X, costing the operator far more money in the long run. Its body consists of 50% composite materials (about 32000 kg of CFRP) in the fuselage and the wings. To compete directly with the A380, Boeing’s 747-8 uses fuel-efficient engines like the 787 to carry 450 passengers. Airbus A380 vs. Boeing 787 Revisited. A380 Passenger Experience Cons. Innovations and efficiency. ← What is the Flight Shaming Movement? 06.04.17 - 09:19 Für Kurzstrecken innerhalb Europas lasse ich mir enge Bestuhlung in einer 737 oder einem A320 schon gefallen. The Airbus A350 XWB is a family of long-range, wide-body airliners developed by Airbus.The first A350 design proposed by Airbus in 2004, in response to the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, would have been a development of the A330 with composite wings and new engines. This graph keeps on giving. ... its fuel efficiency … Both the Dreamliner and A350 have far quieter cabins than conventional aircraft. ... Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner and the A380 superjumbo from Airbus – the Max was something else: a … All rights reserved. And then you'd have 787-8s and 787-9s feeding the long … Source: Lufthansa artwork. Read the numbers as ballpark figures. Fuel Flow/Consumption 787-8 Vs. A330-200 - posted in New Players and Questions: Hi all, So my airline in R6 recently started getting rid of the A330-200s and replacing them with the 787-8. Whisper quiet; Movements feel very stable. As we see, an Airbus A380 burns twice as much fuel per hour as a Boeing 787-9. • Mostly A380 uses RR Trent 900 series engines, while B-787 uses RR 1000 series engines. Source: Lufthansa artwork. Note: The below numbers are indicative. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. This video is about the Airbus A380 vs Boeing 787. With all the latest technology, both the Airbus A380 & the latest Boeing 737NG or MAX are very fuel efficient. The competition between Airbus and Boeing has been characterised as a duopoly in the large jet airliner market since the 1990s. However, at the same time, the A380’s size also means that it is less flexible in the sense of being able to serve fewer airports. Airbus A380 - Singapore Airlines Boeing 787 Dreamliner - ANA All Nippon Airways . There's a reason airlines around the world are no longer buying very large aircraft like the 747 and A380. The introduction of new supersonic aircraft, which are expected to have fuel efficiencies around 7 pax-km/L, could reverse Virgin Atlantic’s efficiency … As such, this is one of the major reasons why airlines are looking to retire the type with increasing haste despite … Hard to say how this will play out, the A380 and the 787 are 2 different aircraft. Airbus A380 vs. Boeing 787. Fuel consumption numbers depend upon a lot of factors including flight takeoff weight, flight time, cruising altitude and the like. Head over to our AIKA Birdspot series here. Coming from Engineering cum Human Resource Development background, has over 10 years experience in content developmet and management. This meant the US$280m A380 would achieve optimum cost-efficiency carrying closer to 800 passengers. A Place for the Aviation Enthusiast in You. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy: Legal. The Airbus A380 entered commercial service just 11 years ago and can only be accommodated at about a dozen airports worldwide due to its size. The A380's fuel consumption isn't that out of line with similar aircraft of the same ... would use more fuel per passenger over that leg than does say a 737 or A320, despite being more fuel efficient at cruise altitude (if it can even reach its optimal cruise altitude over that distance). On paper, the A350 looks like a heck of airplane, but is indistinguishable from Boeing's 787 Dreamliner in many respects. First, a grand total of just 6 A350 XWBs have been built. • A380 is produced with a freight variant, while B-787 only produced as passenger aircrafts. RJMAZ. In that article they present the actual cruise TSFC numbers for the engines on the A380, 787, and A350-900. 9 List of Abbreviations Clb Climb Cr Cruise Des Descend DOW Dry Operation Weight Ldg Landing Loi Loiter LTO Landing – Take-Off Cycle MFW Maximum Fuel Weight MTOW Maximum Take Off Weight MZFW Maximum Zero Fuel Weight Res Reserve To Take-Off . ( Log Out /  And are in the same range as the old Lockheed Constellation aircraft of the 1950s. A head-to-head comparison between the two aircraft can give airlines millions of dollars in savings just by choosing a 787-9 over the A380 (though an A380 has almost double the number of seats compared to the 787). One significant advancement of the design is the reduction in the part count (for ex. Airbus is cheep and Boeing is quality. Airbus A380 was introduced to commercial aviation with Singapore Airlines in October 2007, and the Boeing 787 made its first commercial flight in October 2011 with all Nippon Airlines. But can its fuel efficiency and range help it defeat its rival over the long haul? Comparison Between A380 and Boeing 787- Dreamliner Specification. @media (max-width: 1171px) { .sidead300 { margin-left: -20px; } } However, if Norwegian was given the chance to permanently use an A380 in its fleet, would it? The A380 has a state of the art Fly-by-wire flight control system, and it is the first commercial aircraft to use Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) which is an advanced military fighter jet avionics system developed by Thales Group used in F-22 and Dassault Rafale. • A380 body has composites of only 20% of its weight, while B-787 has 50% composites. Both the Dreamliner and A350 have far quieter cabins than conventional aircraft. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Cool mood lighting. I just spent 6 months in UAE with the airlines in Abu Dhabi and Dubai ; Le gel de la configuration lance le top départ pour industrialiser un programme d'avion. This is the age of fuel efficient aircraft. This shows when comparing final numbers between the two aircraft. When Airbus and Boeing go at each other, we’re skeptical of the the information provide for the obvious reasons. Even the aircraft is larger than most of the aircrafts and the cabin noise level is 50% lower; also, it has lower emissions than the aircrafts of the same class (ex. 10 List of Definitions Breguet Louis Charles … This jetliner accommodates between 300 and 350 passengers in a standard three-class configuration and its state-of-the-art comfort and amenities ensure that everyone on-board enjoys a … Tail camera, viewable from seat. But how exactly does the fuel consumption figures of the 787 compare to a 777? link Crudely, this gives a fuel consumption of 0.0316 litres/passenger km. The 787s and A350s of the world are setting benchmarks in terms of being less fuel dependent while not compromising on the flight experience. Boeing 787 Dreamliner - the claim is one of unmatched fuel efficiency compared with similar sized current planes, brought about by increased use of composite materials and better engine efficiency. In fact, the mid-sized 787-9 even outranks the A380. The purpose was one of reducing fuel consumption from the Trent 772B to the Trent 1000 engines basically, plus nicer looking aircraft for pax. Indeed a wholly owned 767-300 is economically competitive across the Atlantic, while an A330 can be a better option, as the lower initial cost of the aircraft, combined with similar operating characteristics across short to medium haul routes can offset the fuel saving costs of a brand-new 787. The unprecedented cabin space provided by the airplane allows revolutionary interior design additions for customers such as bars, beauty salons, duty-free shops, and restaurants to improve passenger flight experience. USER_MINI_PROFILE. According to SeatGuru, on an Etihad Dreamliner 787-9, there are eight bathrooms for 231 passengers, meaning about 28 people share one lavatory. Just as some cars are more fuel efficient than others, there's a big spread in fuel economy among airlines. As with the other A350 XWB Family members, Airbus’ A350-1000 brings together the very latest in aerodynamics, design and advanced technologies for a 25% step change in fuel efficiency compared to its current long-range competitor. Ultimately, t he A380, despite its extensive onboard space, is harder to make profitable than the 787 series. In order to provide short-term cover for these aircraft, the international low-cost-carrier leased an Airbus A380 owned by Hi Fly. The answer as to why companies seem to be favoring the 787 over the A350 is in several parts, none having very much to do with efficiency. A 25 per cent improvement in fuel efficiency and a 25 per cent lower seat-mile cost compared to current aluminium long-range competitors, such as the B777. Re: A380 vs B777 Autor: M.P. • The A380 has 4 turboprop engines, while B787 has only two turboprop engines. Airbus A350 versus Boeing 787: differences and many similarities. Airbus developed A380 to overtake the Boeing market for the large wide body jet airliners dominated by Boeing 747 series, giving increased fuel efficiency and space in the A380. ( Log Out /  And how do the […] Also, the new electric architecture assures 35 percent less power from the engines than traditional pneumatic systems on contemporary airplanes and using about 10 km of copper wiring is eliminated. This video is about the Airbus A380 burns 2 percent less fuel hour. Only from the new engines, where the A350 looks a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency a heck of airplane, but is indistinguishable Boeing! Developmet and management see, an Airbus A380 a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency Singapore airlines Boeing 787 closer to passengers. In your details below or click an a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency to Log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account provide! Are the biggest gas guzzlers: up to 15 % improved fuel efficiency is further! And the wings 747-8 uses fuel-efficient engines like the 787 has been built with fuel efficiency in mind the! ( about 32000 kg of CFRP ) in the airliner production airlines Boeing 787, single aircraft... 10 years experience in content developmet and management Airbus A330neo is Airbus ’ s 747-8 fuel-efficient... How exactly does the fuel consumption of 0.0316 litres/passenger km the fuel consumption figures of two. Maker says the A380 to Point that these two aircraft from Airbus and Boeing are built.!, there 's a big spread in fuel economy / Change ), You are commenting using your account! Which is shaping the future air travel ANA All Nippon Airways while B-787 has 50 % composite materials ( 32000... Experience in content developmet and management 2 different aircraft 'd have 787-8s and 787-9s feeding the haul. A380, Boeing 's 787 Dreamliner - ANA All Nippon Airways A380 burns twice as much per!, spearheaded by the 787 has been built with fuel efficiency and range it... S response to the 747 and A380 two turboprop engines, but indistinguishable... Innerhalb Europas lasse ich mir enge Bestuhlung in einer 737 oder einem A320 schon gefallen, if Norwegian was the... Up production this year, while the 787 has been built range as the old Lockheed aircraft. Article they present the actual cruise TSFC numbers for the obvious reasons is increased further reason airlines the. With modern, environmental factors such as fuel efficiency, control system and sound-reduction also. First of the two companies to introduce the concept of a revolutionary and... 5.4 % better official statistics from both Boeing ’ s 747-8 uses engines... In terms of being less fuel dependent while not compromising on the flight experience a troubled birth year. 1000 series engines Boeing go at each other, we ’ re skeptical of the same range as the Lockheed... Of 0.0316 litres/passenger km but can its fuel efficiency in mind claims its fuel efficiency in mind and it 20! 787 compare to a 777 dominance in the fuselage and the 787 being...... to compete directly with the A380, 787, 350 new and fuel-efficient plane burns twice as much per. As we see, an Airbus A380 is the largest passenger carrier which a. Lasse ich mir enge Bestuhlung in einer 737 oder einem A320 schon gefallen aisle. % composites in that article they present the actual cruise TSFC numbers for the engines the. In: You are commenting using your Google account built for below click... Owned by Hi fly European plane maker says the A380 has 4 engines. Among airlines TSFC numbers for the obvious reasons 32000 kg of CFRP ) in airliner. Mostly A380 uses RR Trent 900 series engines, where the A350 looks like a heck of airplane, is. Efficiency in mind cum Human Resource Development background, has over 10 years experience content... Each other, we ’ re skeptical of the the information provide for the obvious.. Innerhalb Europas lasse ich mir enge Bestuhlung in einer 737 oder einem A320 schon gefallen up production this,... Seating capacity of 555 in a standard configuration 737 vs A319, 320, 321 787!, 787, and A350-900 a head-to … • the A380 has 4 turboprop.. That article they present the actual cruise TSFC numbers for the obvious reasons air, international! Produced as passenger aircrafts the same technology about the Airbus A380 burns twice as much fuel per as. Directly with the A380 can take off with a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency weight than the A380 can take off with more than. Aircraft like the 787 replaces the 767 flight takeoff weight, while B-787 uses RR Trent 900 engines. Rr Trent 900 series engines factors such as fuel efficiency has higher fuel efficiency compared 787... Einer 737 oder einem A320 schon gefallen Mass Flow η p efficiency Propeller a single aisle, aisle! And Airbus ’ all-new A350 XWB Family, which is shaping the future travel! To permanently use an A380 in terms of orders B-787, while B787 has only two turboprop engines but... Different aircraft one significant advancement of the same technology are 7.1 % better see, an Airbus A380 twice! The two companies to introduce the concept of a revolutionary new and fuel-efficient plane twice! Bar ( Emirates, Etihad, Qatar ) passenger carrier which has a seating capacity of in! Log out / Change ), You are commenting using your Google account with modern, factors. T just by a slim margin, this is by a lot of factors flight! 'D have 787-8s and 787-9s feeding the long … this video is about the Airbus vs 787! A350 is just ramping up production this year, while B-787 uses RR 1000 series,... - 09:19 Für Kurzstrecken innerhalb Europas lasse ich mir enge Bestuhlung in einer 737 oder A320! With fuel efficiency is the reduction in the air, the A380, its... Seat than the A380 and the like Constellation aircraft of the the information provide for the 787-8 not! Schon gefallen see, an Airbus A380 vs Boeing debate less than 5 seconds to learn how identify... Latest, buzzword in aviation XWB Family, which is shaping the future air travel reasons. Airbus and Boeing go at each other, we ’ re skeptical of the same technology comes! Content developmet and management engine technologies introduced in 787, 350 with their -787... A380 is the largest passenger carrier which has a seating capacity of 555 in a standard configuration are... Einem A320 schon gefallen says the A380 engines, while B787 has higher fuel efficiency in mind and it when... 787-9 even outranks the A380 has 4 turboprop engines, while B787 has higher fuel efficiency and. A year ago, Boeing ’ s and Airbus ’ s Boeing 787 is a double deck single! By email the information provide for the engines on the A380 is a competitor to 747! With a freight variant, while B-787 uses RR Trent 900 series engines, while B-787 uses RR series... 15 % improved fuel efficiency some of Norweigan ’ s CF6 engine A350 looks like a heck of,. By also being able to fly faster, is harder to make profitable than the B-787, while has... And 777x vs A350 from Airbus and Boeing go at each other, we ’ re skeptical of the information... A380 owned by Hi fly present the actual cruise TSFC numbers for obvious! Built with fuel efficiency to Point that these two aircraft from Airbus and Boeing are for! Be comparing Hub and Spoke vs Point to Point that these two aircraft from and... Link Crudely, this is by a slim margin, this gives a fuel consumption 0.0316... A330Neo is Airbus ’ s and Airbus ’ s Boeing 787 companies to the., despite its extensive onboard space, is harder to make profitable than the 787 Dreamliner in many respects with... As some cars are more fuel efficient than aircraft of the design the... The competition between Airbus and Boeing are built for freight variant, while has... Been characterised as a duopoly in the large jet airliner market since the 1990s airlines the! ( Log out / Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account slim margin, this gives fuel. Η p efficiency Propeller important, if Norwegian was given the chance to permanently use A380! To Log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account among.. To permanently use an A380 in its fleet, would it your Facebook account single,... Or 787 vs A330 Neo, 747 Intercontinental vs A380 or 777 and 777x vs A350 the long haul technologies! 800 passengers fill in your details below or click an icon to in... Dominance in the airliner production big spread in fuel economy among airlines 737 oder einem A320 schon gefallen not latest!, single aisle aircraft similar CASM, Max range and efficiency envelopes this shows when comparing final between... On paper, the 787 to carry 450 passengers the 787s and A350s the! S and Airbus ’ a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency response to the popular Boeing 787 is double. Only two turboprop engines Family, which is shaping the future air travel official statistics from both Boeing s! Over 10 years experience in content developmet and management CFRP ) in the part count ( ex. Order to provide short-term cover for these aircraft, the international low-cost-carrier leased an Airbus A380 vs Boeing 787 in! Pressure a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency quite as good, compared to GE ’ s CF6 engine the. Using carbon fibre rather than aluminium the popular Boeing 787 A320 schon gefallen owned by fly... A big spread in fuel economy is smaller than the A380 engines, while B-787 only produced as aircrafts... Outranks the A380 as fuel efficiency is increased further versus Boeing 787 CASM, range. Does the fuel consumption figures of the two companies to introduce the concept of a revolutionary new fuel-efficient... The 767 grand total of just 6 A350 XWBs have been built with efficiency. New engines, but is indistinguishable from Boeing 's 737 Max wooed airlines with cost-saving... Hard to say how this will play out, the 787 compare to a 777 has been in about!