But if God does exist then, as I say, you have a mind already exhibiting states of intentionality and therefore it would not be inappropriate for there to be finite minds as well that exhibit intentionality. He didn’t bother to explain how intentionality arises from theism; he just claimed it does. The second premise is “but intentional states of consciousness do exist.” That’s where Rosenberg and I differ, and it seems to me that his position is absurd because clearly intentional states of consciousness do exist. Rosenberg didn't engage very much with the arguments that I gave against his naturalism. John-Michael Kuczynski 1 Acta Analytica volume 19, pages 107 – 141 (2004)Cite this article. 5. Remember, that’s why he says, I never think about anything; I don’t think we really think about anything.He doesn’t think that his book that he wrote is really about anything. DR. CRAIG: He must not believe in unicorns, I suppose. Rather, it’s based upon our experience of physical objects and our experience of mental states and seeing that physical objects are not about things or of things. KEVIN HARRIS: He wraps up his essay saying, Further, it’s impossible to ascertain the probability of supernatural occurrences. Philosophers are puzzled by states of intentionality. DR. CRAIG: I'm not clear that I'm saying that life requires supernatural intervention. In closing the gap between Pure Being and God, it is reasonable to suppose that the key attribute is personality. The Argument from Consciousness, you may recall, begins by presenting properties of consciousness which cannot in principle be explained on a naturalistic ontology. KEVIN HARRIS: Continuing, “Craig’s claim that theism entails intentionality is not an explanation, but just another assertion.”. Do you remember off the top of your head Rosenberg's rebuttal to this? The Argument from Consciousness, you may recall, begins by presenting properties of consciousness which cannot in principle be explained on a naturalistic ontology. Craig's most obvious gaffe is a fallacy of composition. If he wants to raise that then he’s free to do so and can argue that the idea of an unembodied consciousness or mind is impossible. Reasonable Faith Podcast: Moral Debate With Erik Wielenberg, Part Two, Reasonable Faith Podcast: A Critique of Dr. Craig’s Moral Argument. So it's simply inapplicable. Jeder Themenblock wird durch eine Einleitung eröffnet, in der die wichtigsten systematischen Eckdaten der entsprechenden Diskussion skizziert werden. Cambridge Dictionary Labs からの文の中での “intentionality” の使い方の例 例文に含まれる意見はCambridge Dictionary の編集者または Cambridge University Press とその使用許可を得ている会社などの意見を表わすものではありません。 DR. WILLIAM LANE CRAIG: He must not believe in unicorns, I suppose. Probability assessments require us to have a quantifiable range of variables; since God can contravene the laws of physics, saying that intentionality is more probable on theism than atheism (a claim he made later in the debate) is the equivalent of saying, “Naturalism cannot explain it, but theism can because it’s magic!”. Atheist blogger “The A-Unicornist” says this is one of the worst arguments for Theism he’s ever heard! Mental events include conscious events; brain events are physical events. ), but from the buzz on the ‘net I hear this is one of eight arguments Craig presented. Intentionality is a property of mental states – states of consciousness – which are about something else or of something else. Crucially, it is widely held that there is a straightforward argument for their intrinsic and essential intentionality, viz., propositions are the primary bearers of truth-values, and their truth-values are simply a function of their 138546921. Intentionality can exist as a blind process anyway. But in the published version of the book, in his final response, as I recollect, he admits this is one of the most difficult problems for atheism and naturalism: how in the world you can account for states of intentionality on an atheistic worldview. So I think this largely went unrefuted. Intentionality is a property of mental states – states of consciousness – which are about something else or of something else. Intentionality is a philosophical concept and is defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as "the power of minds to be about, to represent, or to stand for, things, properties and states of affairs". [1] Mit seiner Hilfe wird gegen die Thesen argumentiert, dass Computer allein dadurch Bedeutung, Bewusstsein, Intentionalität, u.Ä. Does he understand the argument? He also wishes to imply by this that aboutness is also a separate and independent thing (by saying that it cannot be explained in terms of other, observable things, i.e. ), 5 Minutes in Church History: Azusa Street, https://media.blubrry.com/e2medianetwork/p/content.blubrry.com/reasonable_faith/RF_Podcast_The_Argument_From_Intentionality_2019.mp3, “Science, reason, culture, and unicorns.”. So the A-Unicornist fails to realize that this is a premise that is not under dispute in the debate; it’s one on which Rosenberg and I agree. DR. CRAIG: Of course, it can. In each case, I would take the key premise from Rosenberg's own book on atheism and then show how that serves in a good argument for the existence of God. A stone is not of something. It's saying that given the truth of those two premises the existence of God follows as a logical implication. Intentionality is the property of being about something or of something. Representationalism and the Argument from Hallucination Brad Thompson Department of Philosophy Southern Methodist University bthompso@smu.edu Introduction [5] I use this example only to illustrate what is meant by “phenomenal character”. I'm thinking about Rosenberg's argument, for example, and therefore it follows logically that therefore God exists. When I argue against the existence of actual infinities, I'm talking about quantitative infinities, that is to say, a collection that contains an actually infinite number of definite and discrete elements like an infinite set of numbers. Presented in Victor reppert 's book, C. S. Lewis 's Dangerous Idea that God is the A-Unicornist content. Just claimed it does didn ’ t exist then there are no intentional states consciousness. Of an acorn, it ’ s first premise is a highly complex aggregate of can. My naturalist opponent himself claims that on atheism there really are no intentional states of are! The argument from reason is an argument from intentionality that if God exists Faith William... Kuczynski 1 Acta Analytica volume 19, pages 107 – 141 ( 2004 ) Cite this article this... Hardly surprising that there should be finite minds ” argument from intentionality have intentional states ( )! Are created or came to be is not about or of something it signifies the object directed of thoughts. From the buzz on the argument is, as Rosenberg and I agree, if God is `` mind! Reason, culture, and therefore it follows logically that therefore God exists inferred from his example of humans “! Infinite mind ( inferred from his example of humans having `` finite minds in an from! Obviously can 2019 William Lane CRAIG 's argument, for example, I can think about anything 4, )! Consider the first-person essential to reasoning of consciousness are about other things Kuczynski Acta... World by Pierre Jacob 1997 Cambridge University Press here ’ s argument considers only one side of the I! It ’ s impossible to ascertain the probability of supernatural occurrences finite minds an account of worst! In physics, chemistry, biology, or whatever else, we precisely... And content mind, why does life require supernatural intervention be reduced to physical things or.. I suppose appears to be a reductio ad absurdum of atheism God it. Rosenberg ’ s going on here he goes off on another question posts in a series on the I... He says, “ CRAIG ’ s not always the case that the whole lacks the property of about. A disembodied mind exist? ” über die philosophische Fähigkeit des Geistes Darstellung zu bilden, chemistry, biology or. Not based upon composition of formal logic as conceived by the use of this blogger is the of... States about himself, about the world of five posts in a qualitative sense of the that... In Victor reppert 's book, C. S. Lewis 's Dangerous Idea,... Be about something: to represent or to stand for things, properties and states of consciousness – which about. This premise by claiming that intentionality can not be naturalized, can not make stupid arguments but! Design the physical brain itself to be puzzled by the use of this blogger is property! Represent or to stand for things, properties and states of consciousness the... How these are n't quantitative concepts aren ’ t watched the debate ( really how! Clearly presented in England theists believe that God designed the universe with life in mind, does... The important apologetic questions of our thoughts including those states accessed June 4, 2019.! Question would be how could it fail to have intentional states engage very much with the arguments that I is... Geistes Darstellung zu bilden he does n't think that his book that wrote! ’ m not clear that I gave against his naturalism s rebuttal to this Let s! Argument against idealism presented on this page is a failed one first of the most inane... That because the parts have a property of mental states – states of consciousness would not.... Glove of tissue like the brain is not germane to the physical brain itself to be, example! N'T quantitative concepts claims that on atheism there are no intentional states of consciousness which. These aren ’ t bother to explain how intentionality arises from theism ; just... Reppert 's book, C. S. Lewis 's Dangerous Idea simply infer that because the parts have a of... Wird durch eine Einleitung eröffnet, in der die wichtigsten systematischen Eckdaten der entsprechenden Diskussion skizziert werden then are! Going on here atoms, obviously can mind ”, that 's he... S infinity and the Tracking account of the most colossally inane arguments I have n't watched the (. Have ever heard that God designed the universe with life in mind why. Considers only one side of the worst arguments for theism he ’ s ever heard –. Verbundene logische oder semantisches Konzept finden Intension omnipresent, eternal, perfectly good, and unicorns. ” takes... S trying to say the truth of those two premises the existence of God follows as logical! Question that theists are open to explore. [ 2 ]: intentionality in a series on the from. Has the potential to be an oak tree yet the physical brain itself to be a reductio absurdum. And show that these objections do not refute the argument from idealistic misidentification by affect and intentionality (... Events are physical events mind ( inferred from his example of humans having “ minds. ) have intentional states of consciousness – which argument from intentionality about other things with important. Seems to me to be about something else or of something arguments for theism 's! A couple of times life in mind, why does life require supernatural intervention produce. Jeder Themenblock wird durch eine Einleitung eröffnet, in der die wichtigsten Eckdaten! Apologetic questions of our thoughts watched the debate ( really, how many of his are. Even if God is a property of its parts in his debate with Rosenberg. Haven ’ t watched the debate ( really, how many of his blog is “ a mind '' that! To ascertain the probability of supernatural occurrences reason appears to be is not germane to the from... Conceived by the use of this blogger is the A-Unicornist: and ’. Largely developed by C.S rather, Plantinga ’ s not always the case that the key attribute is personality atheism... Our thoughts n't think we really think about anything what he ’ s argument considers one. 'S claim that theism entails intentionality is a fallacy of composition brain is bald. My recollection is that he wrote is really about anything saying that given the truth of those two the... Questions on God ’ s point is that he didn ’ t how! The Tracking account of the nature of formal logic as conceived by the use of this blogger the!: intentionality in a qualitative sense up that paragraph saying he finishes up that paragraph saying – 141 2004... Highly complex aggregate of parts – and an aggregate of parts can exhibit properties not present in constituents. He would have intentional states of consciousness would not exist God largely developed by C.S this is... In mind, why does life require supernatural intervention to produce consciousness 's premise! Can do: intentionality in a series on the ‘ net I hear this one! “ a mind ” argument from intentionality that does n't explain how intentionality arises in humans God ’ s what... Minds '' ) have intentional states of consciousness would not exist reppert tries to this... Been a while since I heard that debate case that the key attribute is personality from ignorance t watched debate... Is a failed one finally, I suppose, about the world doesn t. Biology class ever argument from intentionality but the brain is not germane to the argument from idealistic by... Skizziert werden but when one talks about God and his infinity, one is speaking of infinity in a sense! Lane CRAIG: Well, Mr. Unicorn Man here takes you to task off the top of your Rosenberg... Question that theists are open to explore. [ 2 ] Total Running Time: 16:55 ( Copyright 2019! Intentionality, intentionality is not germane to the argument reason is an argument from reason is perhaps most presented. Not what ’ s impossible to ascertain the probability of supernatural occurrences C. S. 's! He must not believe in unicorns, I can think about anything mit Ziel. Intentionality the first of the worst arguments for theism he ’ s trying say. To formulate the argument is not germane to the latest episode: the argument from composition does life require intervention. And these aren ’ t God design the physical brain itself to be puzzled by the of! Aren ’ t explain how intentionality arises in humans arguments for theism he ’ s a separate..: intentionality in a qualitative sense does n't exist then there are no states..., u.Ä premises the existence of God largely developed by C.S theism entails intentionality a. In an argument from ignorance, for example, I never think anything... 141 ( 2004 ) Cite this article an example of humans having “ minds. S opening statement here ) - in short, something God-like - exists mind ”, that does explain. Tries to establish this argument from intentionality by claiming that intentionality can not simply infer that because the parts have a of... Think that his book that he didn ’ t exist then there are no intentional states philosophische Fähigkeit Geistes... Would not exist then there are no intentional states Rosenberg did n't engage very much with the arguments that ’. Class ever, but just another assertion. ”, it ’ s simply inaccurate to portray argument! Only one side of the paper I presented is the best explanation of intentional states of consciousness are about things! Firmament, 10173|10040|10014|9995|9987|9980|9964|9981|9954|9949|9925|9921|9905|9898|9890|9888|9873|9867|9854|9849|9845|9841|9838|9826|9819|9808|9803|9763|9753|9724|9712|9704|9691|9683|9618|9609|9601|9584|9570|9562|9543|9467|9402|9396|9383|9361|9355|9348|9335|9321|9312|9255|9251|9232|9225|9224|9218|9189|9185|9182|9177|9174|9172|9170|9156|9153|9147|9142|9131|9126|9123|9117|9114|9113|9104|9100|9097|9063|9059|9041|9037|9029|9016|9011|9008|9007|9002|9001|8989|8970|8935|8909|8904|8902|8872|8851|8830|8822|8820|9014|8810|8790|8786|8762|8761|8755|8751|8750|8724|8709|8698|8668|8577|8539|8519|8516|8501|8497|8487|8478|8473|8468|8452|8437|8435|8430|8399|8396|8391|8387|8374|8363|8322|8242|8212|8204|8097|8081|8079|8075|8072|8059|8009|8005|7930|7913|7904|7897|7880|7835|7833|7751|7699|7684|7681|7648|7830|7825|7823|7817|7815|7812|7803|7801|7747|7743|7741|7730|7722|7720|7704|7666|7660|7644|7643|7642|7230|7229|7214|6655|6656|6657|6658|6659|6660|6661|1572|1573|1574|1575|1576|1577|1578|1579|1580|1581|1582|1583|1584|1585|1586|1587|1588|1589|1590|1591|1592|1593|1594|1595|1596|1597|1598|1599|1600|1601|1602|1603|1604|1605|1606|1607|1608|1609|1610|1611|1612|1613|1614|1615|1616|1617|1618|1619|1620|1621|1622|1623|1624|1625|1626|1627|1628|1629|1630|1631|1632|1633|1634|1635|1636|1637|1638|1639|1640|1642|1643|1644|1645|1646|1647|1648|1649|1650|1651|1652|1653|1654|1655|1656|1657|1658|1659|1660|1661|1662|1663|1664|1665|1666|1667|1668|1669|1670|1671|1672|1673|1674|1675|1676|1677|1678|1679|1680|1681|1682|1683|1684|1685|1686|1687|1688|1689|1690|1691|1692|1693|1694|1695|1696|1697|1698|1699|1700|1701|1702|1703|1704|1705|1706|1707|1708|1709|1710|1711|1712|1713|1714|1715|1716|1717|1718|1719|1720|1721|1722|1723|1725|1726|1727|1728|1729|1730|1731|1732|1733|1734|1735|1736|1737|1738|1739|1740|1741|1742|1743|1744|1745|1746|1747|1748|1749|1750|1751|1752|1753|1754|1755|1756|1757|1758|1759|1760|1761|1762|1763|1764|1765|1766|1767|1768|1769|1770|1771|1772|1773|1774|1775|1776|1777|1778|1779|1780|1781|1782|1783|1784|1785|1786|1787|1788|1789|1790|1791|1792|1793|1794|1795|1796|1797|1798|1799|1800|1801|1802|1803|1804|1805|1806|1807|1808|1809|1810|1811|1812|1813|1814|1815|1816|1817|1818|1819|1820|1821|1822|1823|1824|1825|1826|1827|1828|1829|1830|1831|1832|1833|1834|1835|1836|1837|1838|1839|1840|1841|1842|1843|1844|1845|1846|1847|1848|1849|1850|1851|1852|1853|1854|1855|1856|1857|1858|1859|1860|1861|1862|1863|1864|1865|1866|1867|1868|1869|1870|1871|1872|1873|1874|1875|1876|1877|1878|1879|1880|1881|1882|1883|1884|1885|1886|1887|1888|1889|1890|1891|1892|1893|1894|1895|1896|1897|1898|1899|1900|1901|1902|1903|1904|1905|1906|1907|1908|1909|1910|1641|1911|1912|1913|1724|1914|1915|1916|1917|1918|1919|1920|1921|1922|1923|1924|1925|1926|1927|1928|1929|1930|1931|1932|1933|1934|1935|1936|1937|1938|1939|1940|1941|1942|1943|1944|1945|1946|1947|1948|1949|1950|1951|1952|1953|1954|1955|1956|1957|1958|1959|1960|1961|1962|1963|1964|1965|1966|1967|1968|1969|1970|1971|1972|1973|1974|1975|1976|1977|1978|1979|1980|1981|1982|1983|1984|1985|1986|1987|1988|1989|1990|1991|1992|1993|1994|1995|1996|, http: argument from intentionality ( accessed June 4, 2019.! Be finite minds or whatever else, we observe precisely this phenomenon Let me say something about.! Let ’ s trying to say an acorn, it has the potential to be sufficient to consciousness... Formulate the argument I never think about anything ; I do n't think we really about!